How AI is Reshaping College for Students and Professors
| Source: PBS NewsHour | Reporter: Fred de Sam Lazaro | Series: Rethinking College
Executive Summary
This PBS NewsHour report examines generative AI’s transformation of higher education. The 2024-2025 senior class is the first to complete their college career during the AI era. While 86% of college students use ChatGPT, Claude, and other AI tools, universities struggle with academic integrity, learning outcomes, and job market readiness.
The AI Problem in Academia
Reality Check
- Generative AI creates content indistinguishable from human work
- Tasks taking hours/days now take minutes
- 86% of college students use AI for schoolwork
Professor Megan Fritts (Philosophy, UA Little Rock)
- Noticed unusual student writing 2 years ago
- Essays sounded like business documents - polished but impersonal
- Problem: Reading AI means losing her best tool to assess teaching effectiveness
- Uses 8 different detection softwares
- Detection is imperfect and time-consuming
- Meets students individually to verify understanding
Academic Integrity Crisis
False Accusations Problem
Ashley Dunn (Louisiana State University)
- Flagged by AI detection tool for short essay
- Panicked: Could fail the class or get zero
- Eventually got an A after professor review
- On TikTok found widespread similar cases
- Many students got zeros; some failed the class
- Teachers flagged normal writing conventions like em-dashes as AI
The Flaw
- High false positive rates in detection tools
- Standard academic conventions trigger flags
- Professors can’t differentiate legitimate vs. AI work
Two Institutional Approaches
APPROACH 1: Restrictive (UA Little Rock)
Framework:
- Professors determine acceptable AI use
- Must outline in syllabus
Key Quote - Vice Provost Brian Berry:
- “Technology outpacing our ability to detect it”
- Need framework for innovation while minimizing risk
Message to Students:
- If used right: Most powerful tool ever
- If misused: Short circuits learning
APPROACH 2: Progressive (Ohio State University)
AI Fluency Initiative - Executive VP Ravi Bellamkonda:
- ALL undergraduates must learn and use AI tools
- Determines what to offload to technology vs. humans
- Goal: Lead rule creation rather than follow
Entrepreneurship Class - Professor Lori Kendall
- Encourages AI to critically examine original work
- Uses as learning aid, not shortcut
- Rationale: AI proficiency essential for job market
Student Perspective - Rachel Gervais (Air Transportation)
- Generates study questions with AI
- Tests understanding of weak areas
- Deepens material comprehension
Innovative Applications Across Disciplines
Music Professor Tina Tallon’s AI and Music Class
Teaching Model:
- Identify challenges in students’ field
- Find real problems to solve
- Apply AI solutions
Case 1: Will Roesch (Tuba Instructor, Doctoral Student)
- AI analyzes airflow over thousands of repetitions
- Creates data-driven guidance for perfect notes
- Helps students improve technique scientifically
Case 2: Natalia Moreno Buitrago (Music Ed Graduate Student)
- Researching how babies learn music
- Problem: Spent hours combing through home recordings
- Solution: AI detects when parents sing/hum around infants
- Outcome: Dramatically reduced research time
- Key insight: Critical examination enables incredible things
Core Tensions
Professor Fritts’ Dilemma
- “Teaching sometimes feels like policing”
- Detecting instead of teaching
- Detection creates false accusations and anxiety
Three Perspectives
Restrictive: AI threatens integrity, prioritize detection, risk: false accusations and policing culture
Pragmatic: Students will use AI anyway, teach responsible use, risk: real cheating harder to catch
Progressive: AI is workforce skill, must integrate across curriculum, risk: dilutes academic standards
Economic & Job Market Disruption
Key Issue:
- Jobs students train for may not exist
- Both academia and job market affected
Provost Bellamkonda’s Critical Question: “How do we navigate transformation with disruptions while improving society and human lot?”
Answer: Still unclear
Key Takeaways
✅ Reality:
- AI entrenched in higher ed
- Detection imperfect, creates false accusations
- Job market demands AI literacy
✅ Challenge:
- Balance academic integrity with integration
- Protect from misuse AND detection errors
- Prepare AI-ready graduates
✅ Solutions Emerging:
- Professor discretion with clear policies (UA Little Rock)
- Mandatory AI literacy across disciplines (Ohio State)
- Domain-specific applications
- Responsible use education
✅ For Students:
- Understand institutional policies
- Use AI for learning, not shortcuts
- Develop critical thinking about AI
- Prepare AI fluency as job requirement
The Bottom Line
Higher education faces inflection point. Progressive institutions ask: “How teach responsible AI use?” rather than “How ban it?”
First generation graduating in AI age will be better equipped for workforce—but only if universities shift from detection/punishment toward education/integration.
Critical Question: Will universities lead or follow market forces?